Intellectual Property

Our Intellectual Property team has significant expertise in protecting, exploiting and commercialising intellectual property.  Our client base is diverse, operating in a range of industries.  The team’s key strengths are:

  • Intellectual property portfolio management services.
  • Intellectual property audits and assessments to identify assets, underlying ownership and use rights.
  • Everything to do with trade marks.
  • Brand clearance searches.
  • Registration and management of business names and domain names.
  • Patent licensing.
  • Advising on strategies to minimise exposure to liability and loss of intellectual capital.
  • Due diligence for major transactions.
  • Working with patent attorneys to obtain patents and also for claim construction and infringement and validity evidence.
  • Advice and preparation of submissions to the Registrars & Examiners of IP Australia.
  • Identification, safeguarding proprietary rights and establishment of appropriate commercialisation frameworks.
  • Undertaking intellectual property policy/reviews, acting for a significant number of private and public sector bodies, we assist in compliance with any necessary laws, policies or procedures.

The majority of our trade mark and business name work is done on a fixed fee basis and our hourly rates compare very favourably to larger firms.

Recognition

KHQ is recommended in the Leading Intellectual Property & TMT Law Firms (South Australia, 2018) category in the highly regarded Doyles Guide, with Fiona Gilbert also  recommended in the Leading Intellectual Property & TMT Lawyers (South Australia,2018) category.

Leading Intellectual Property & TMT Lawyers (South Australia) 2018.

Related News & Insights

Do you really own your trade mark?


Posted By on 16/07/18 at 4:01 PM

The case of Pham Global Pty Ltd v Insight Clinical Imaging Pty Ltd [2017] FCAFC 83 has raised significant interest regarding the ownership of a trade mark and the circumstances in which ownership may be challenged. In Pham, the Full Court of the Federal Court held that the requirement for ownership of a trade mark … Read more

Who’s who in the zoo – how independent is your Australian IP Attorney?


Posted By on 23/02/18 at 9:51 AM

Increasing concerns in Australia and New Zealand around conflicts arising from the new business model of publicly listed companies acquiring multiple Australian and New Zealand IP Firms have led to the new Code of Conduct for Trans-Tasman Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys 2018 which commences today. These concerns are centred on the independence of these … Read more

Lending to tech businesses – registering security over IP


Posted By on 29/07/16 at 9:55 AM

Consciousness of the importance and value of intellectual property assets continues to grow. Given this increasing focus, those lending to businesses with significant IP assets must ensure any general security they take for this lending covers IP, as well as the more “traditional” assets of the borrower. Securities over personal property including IP are governed … Read more